Legislature(2011 - 2012)
2011-04-16 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2011-04-16 House Journal Page 1068 HB 164 Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 1053) on the following: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 164(FIN) "An Act relating to health care insurance, exemption of certain insurers, reporting, notice, and record-keeping requirements for insurers, biographical affidavits, qualifications of alien insurers assuming ceded insurance, risk-based capital for insurers, insurance holding companies, licensing, federal requirements for nonadmitted insurers, surplus lines insurance, insurance fraud, life insurance policies and annuity contracts, rate filings by health care insurers, long-term care insurance, automobile service corporations, guaranty fund deposits of a title insurer, joint title plants, fraternal benefit societies, multiple employer welfare arrangements, hospital and medical service corporations, health maintenance organizations, and alternate forms of payment to policyholders; and providing for an effective date." and SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 164(L&C) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Austerman moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 164(FIN), thus adopting SCS CSHB 164(L&C), and recommended that the members vote yes. 2011-04-16 House Journal Page 1069 The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 164(FIN)?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 164(L&C) Concur YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Cissna, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kerttula, Lynn, Miller, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. SCS CSHB 164(L&C) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.